![]() ![]() The report expresses outright how easily confidential information could have slipped out, whether deliberately or accidentally. Overall, it is paradoxical that an institution that cloaks itself in secrecy and casts itself above other Washington institutions would be exposed as such a sieve. She said she did not ask the justices to sign sworn affidavits, as she had asked their law clerks, and that none of the leads she pursued implicated the justices or their spouses. ![]() On Friday, Curley put out a statement saying she had spoken to the justices but suggesting that it was in a less formal process than her interviews with employees. There was no mention of possible interviews with the nine individual justices or their spouses. It also suggests certain boundaries on who was investigated, referring only to employee scrutiny. Yet each page rings with limitations and dead ends. Supreme Court issues report on Dobbs leak but says it hasn't identified the leaker The rising sun creeps across the US Supreme Court on Novemin Washington, DC. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |